Skip to main content
Editorial Policy

How We Create Disease Information

Our goal is simple but serious: to provide clear, trustworthy, and compassionate information about rare diseases, at scale, without losing accuracy, humility, or care.

Who Our Information Is For

Patients & Caregivers

Those living with or caring for someone with a rare disease, seeking clear, reliable information.

Families

People facing a new or uncertain diagnosis, looking for understanding and next steps.

Everyone

Anyone seeking a clear, reliable overview, regardless of medical training.

We understand that many readers may be reading under emotional stress, new to medical terminology, or looking for reassurance as well as facts. This shapes not only what we say, but how we say it.

Our Editorial Principles

Seven principles guide every piece of content you see on our platform.

Patient-First, Not Overwhelming

We aim to explain, not overload. Clear, plain language whenever possible. Medical terms explained when necessary. Focus on what matters most for understanding the condition and next steps.

Clear, plain languageMedical terms explainedPrioritize clarity over completeness

Accuracy With Caution

Medical knowledge evolves. We take a conservative approach to claims. You'll see phrases like "may help," "can support," or "has been shown to help some individuals." Cautious language is a safety feature.

No guarantees or absolutesConservative claimsSafety-first framing

Honesty About Uncertainty

Rare disease data is often incomplete or still emerging. When evidence is limited, mixed, or evolving, we say so clearly. Transparency builds trust.

"Not fully understood""Data are limited""Knowledge continues to evolve"

Recognition That Experiences Vary

No two people experience a rare disease in exactly the same way. Every report emphasizes that symptoms, severity, and outcomes can differ. We avoid "always," "never," or "all individuals."

Individual variability notedNo universal statementsReal-world experience reflected

Awareness That Medicine Changes

Some conditions are understood differently today than a decade ago. When relevant, reports reflect how earlier descriptions may differ from current care and why older literature may not reflect today's reality.

Historical context providedNewer treatments notedEvolving understanding acknowledged

Respectful, Non-Stigmatizing Language

We are careful with terminology. Outdated terms are clearly labeled as such and included only to help readers recognize older medical records. Our focus is describing conditions, not labeling individuals.

Outdated terms marked clearlyPerson-first languageDignity preserved

Psychosocial Impact Matters

Living with a rare disease affects more than physical health. Our reports acknowledge emotional impact, caregiver responsibilities, quality of life, and the importance of community and advocacy groups.

Emotional impact recognizedCaregiver needs includedSupport resources highlighted

How Our Reports Are Created

AI allows us to scale responsibly, but it does not replace editorial standards.

1

Knowledge Synthesis

Our AI systems extract information from trusted medical and scientific sources, including disease ontologies, genetic databases, clinical references, and research registries.

2

AI-Powered Drafting

Advanced AI synthesizes this information into patient-friendly reports following a consistent structure, easy to navigate, comparable across diseases, and designed for clarity.

3

Rigorous Quality Control

Before publication, every report undergoes automated verification: gene accuracy, treatment language, uncertainty handling, prognosis framing, and terminology review.

Quality Assurance

Rigorous Safety Checks

Before publication, every report undergoes automated verification designed to protect accuracy and safety.

Gene & Inheritance Verification

Correct use of genes and inheritance patterns

Conservative Treatment Language

Safe, accurate treatment information

Uncertainty Handling

Appropriate framing of unknowns

Prognosis Framing

Careful handling of outcomes and expectations

Terminology Review

Respectful, non-stigmatizing language

Source Attribution

Traceable references to authoritative sources

Some reports may also be reviewed or claimed by verified medical professionals.

Learn about our Trust Architecture

Sources & Transparency

Every report links back to its original scientific and medical sources, so readers can see where information comes from, explore original materials, and verify data independently.

Transparency is a core part of trust.

MO

MONDO

Disease classification

OM

OMIM

Genetic data

Or

Orphanet

Epidemiology

HP

HPO

Clinical phenotypes

Cl

ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial data

FD

FDA

Drug approvals

What Our Reports Are, and Are Not

Our reports are:

  • Educational resources for understanding rare diseases
  • Patient-friendly explanations of complex medical topics
  • Designed to support informed conversations with healthcare providers

Our reports are not:

  • Medical advice or diagnosis
  • A substitute for professional healthcare
  • A guarantee of diagnosis, treatment, or outcome

Always consult qualified healthcare professionals to discuss your individual situation and medical needs.

Feedback & Continuous Improvement

We know that no system is perfect. Every disease page includes a way to report inaccuracies or concerns directly. Feedback submitted by users is reviewed by our team and helps guide corrections, updates, and ongoing improvements.

We view patients, caregivers, and clinicians as partners in quality, not passive readers.

Our Commitment

Rare diseases affect real people and families. We take that responsibility seriously.

Thoughtful

Careful consideration in every word

Careful

Safety-first approach to claims

Transparent

Clear about sources and limitations

Improving

Growing with advancing science

Trust is earned over time. This editorial policy is how we work to earn it, every day.